How do you write what people actually want to read?
View all responses
The real test of writing is not whether the writer enjoyed writing it, but whether a reader finds a reason to keep reading. That reason is rarely found in the writer’s cleverness. It is found in the reader’s life—in a question they carry, a concern they revisit, or a thought they have not yet found words for.
Across traditions, from Rumi to the Letter of James to the Tamil poet Avvaiyar, the counsel is remarkably similar: listen first, then offer something that matters. When a writer’s curiosity meets a reader’s need, content becomes conversation.
Listen to What They Want, Write What They Need
People read because they want something: a useful answer, a fresh perspective, a moment of recognition, a little encouragement, or simply the feeling that someone has put into words what they themselves were thinking.
The usual advice follows naturally: find out what people want, and give it to them.
I believe that advice is only half right.
Good writing does begin by listening to what people want, but it ends by giving them what they need—and the two are not always the same.
1. Writing begins with the ear, not the pen.
The writer’s first task is to listen.
Listen to conversations. Listen to questions. Listen to the concerns people repeat. Listen to silence. Listen even to the subjects people avoid, because what goes unsaid is often what most needs saying.
Before a writer can speak meaningfully to readers, the writer must first learn to hear them.
2. What people ask for is only the surface.
Readers may say they want quick tips, short lists, and headlines that promise everything in five minutes. But look beneath the request, and something deeper often appears.
The person searching for “ten ways to sleep better” may really be asking how to quiet a worried mind.
The request is the door. The need is the room behind it.
Good writing does not stop at the door.
3. An old Indian teaching tradition wrapped the need inside the want.
The Panchatantra, the ancient Indian collection of animal fables, is traditionally framed around a problem every writer understands. A king had three sons who would not learn, and conventional study would have taken years. A teacher named Vishnu Sharma promised to make them wise in six months—and he did it through stories of jackals, crows, lions, and tortoises.
The princes wanted entertainment.
They needed statecraft.
He gave them both, and the lesson arrived without announcing itself.
That is a powerful lesson for writers. Sometimes the most effective way to give readers what they need is to begin with something they already want.
4. Every tradition places listening before speaking.
Rumi opens his great Masnavi not with instruction, but with a command to the ear: listen to the reed as it tells its tale of separation.
The Letter of James counsels believers to be quick to listen and slow to speak.
Traditions that agree on little else agree on this: those who wish to be heard must first learn to hear.
For a writer, listening is not a preliminary exercise. It is part of the writing itself.
5. Write to offer, not to display.
The Tamil poet Avvaiyar is remembered for a line of striking humility: what we have learned is a handful of earth; what we have not learned is the size of the world.[1]
A writer who writes chiefly to show what they know is writing to a mirror.
A writer who writes to offer something useful, meaningful, or illuminating is writing for another human being.
Those who draft laws learn the same discipline. A statute is not written for the person who drafts it, but for the citizen who may one day have to read it, understand it, and live by it.
Writing, at its best, is an act of service.
6. Listening is not the same as obeying.
Here the argument needs a counterweight.
A writer who merely echoes what the crowd wants becomes a vending machine: press a button, receive a product.
Popularity is not proof of value, and the most-clicked article is not always the most-needed one.
Yet the opposite error is just as real. A writer who ignores what readers want becomes a preacher in an empty hall—correct perhaps, but unheard.
Vishnu Sharma did neither.
He did not lecture the princes, and he did not merely amuse them. He listened to what they would accept and used it to carry what they required.
That may be one of the finest principles of writing: meet readers where they are, then take them somewhere worth going.
7. The real test belongs to the reader.
The question is not, “Did I enjoy writing this?”
It is:
“Will someone find a reason to keep reading?”
That reason may be an answer that works, a thought that stays, or a sentence that makes someone say, “Yes, that is exactly what I felt.”
Every one of those reasons lives in the reader’s life, not in the writer’s pride.
So, how do you write what people actually want to read?
You listen long enough to discover what they want, and you care enough to give them what they need.
Because readers may click for curiosity, stay for relevance, and return for value.
When the writer’s curiosity meets the reader’s need, writing becomes more than content.
It becomes a conversation.
The Tamil poet Avvaiyar is remembered for a line of striking humility: what we have learned is a handful of earth; what we have not learned is the size of the world.
Note for readers
[1] Avvaiyar is the name given to one or more revered women poets of Tamil literature across different centuries. The line quoted here, “Katrathu kaimann alavu, kallathathu ulagalavu” in Tamil, is traditionally attributed to her and is widely taught in Tamil Nadu as a lesson in intellectual humility.
John Britto Kurusumuthu
Rise & Inspire · riseandinspire.co.in
In response to the WordPress Daily Writing Prompt — 24 September 2026
© 2026 Rise&Inspire. All Rights Reserved.
Website: Home | Blog | About Us | Contact| Resources
Word Count:999